advancing off-shore military justice systems to exterminate Cultivation of local Law Enforcement CC stalking effect rationalized as "duty"

A Media Ethicist has to prevail over the Kantian "duty" moralism of an administrator monitoring inter-actions. Why? Because the administrator's gratification is not money, it's the entertainment value of violence upon which their appetitive nature was cultivated on. My fundamental arguement is that Media Ethicists must prevail over administrative stalkers acting as "monitors".

Which administrator savors the 'entertainment' value of violence against private citizens when someone states "I was in front of my computer monitor"; Raffaele Sollecito when asked of his whereabouts during the hours of the murder of Meredith Kercher.

The administrator acts as the Kantian "duty ethics" moral justification factor like the repeated claim to duty Rudolph Hoess utilized at the Nuremberg trials in which he, the Auschwitz commandant, monitored the daily killings and experimentations of thousands of Jews, homosexuals, and political dissenters.

The murder of Meredith Kercher and the recent assault of a tired paying passenger on the New York city metro share a common fact underlying brutality: a "monitor" oversaw its moral virtue. Moral? Yes, according to the Jacques Maritain rules of beauty in the art of violence against citizens by those acting under the "monitor": patience, the inter-action was rehearsed; prudence, carefully executed under a monitor; balance, a non-white Rudi Guede or female police officer is present; pathos, the timing to startle the target triggers a startle effect which is then documented as "resisting" an 'officer'; beauty, the inter-action is privately savoured as reward in the private library of the administrator(s)/parasites. 

The closed-circuit nature of violence as entertainment among law-enforcement has to come under the communication science scrutiny which Media Ethicists, such as I was trained in and taught, specialize in. When studying a case it is necessary to evaluate four questions: what are the facts; who are the stakeholders; what are the loyalties; what are the issues (past, current, and future).

The NYC metro video surveillance and resulting police brutality videotaped

 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=6e7_1404340015

This is an excellent example of repeated exposure of parasitic audiences, i.e. law enforcement, their obsessingly stalking and fantasizing about a person on subway videosurveillance camera placed in the scrolling digital screen visible at 5 seconds into the video, and the accrued paparazzi effect resulting in excessive force targetting the object of their fantasy, be that a non-white, a woman, homosexual, or handicapped/different person. In this example of a host-parasite co-evolution inter-action the host, like a James Dean or Meredith Kercher seeming bigger in status than the petty parasitic cops attracts attention as this tall, clean cut fellow who's obviously not a bum nor street person, clean shirt, good haircut, and obviously his reaction is only a starle effect from being woken up rudely by parasites while still sleepily disoriented. The distinction here is that the public figures whose murders were covered up by the police (James Dean and Meredith Kercher) signed release documents for the use of their images from which they earned a substantial profit. Unlike public figures, such as the myself or the man attacked in the video, we are private citizens which the police stalk like paparazzi with no payment, thus we are not public figures and yes we are the victims of parasite stalkers, namely the police at their 'monitors'. Because the parasites obviously didn't gently try to help him and instead just grabbed him with the shoot first and after jail get a lawyer mentality - he doesn't see parasites/police at first, he rightfully only sees parasitic thugs - then he realizes it's police brutality and his evolutionary mechanism kicks in resisting long enough to make certain, without striking out at the parasites, that the event and badge numbers of the parasites are thoroughly documented by an evolutionary survival kit against parasites: the videocamera held by a woman - kudos to this man for bravery in front of his audience, he's obviously an attractor hunted by paparazzi/police like pedophile priests fantasize about altar assistants and parishioners. Obviously the man is simple and clean like you, he does have a clean shirt and looks tidy, thus he has a place to wash up and take care of his needs, and assumes responsibility for his appearances like you. Thus, like you, he appears a law-abiding person who simply, exhausted, fell asleep then was startled, and without striking out assessed his predicament as a private citizen stalked by parasites while making certain the lady with a videocamera documented everything so he can sue the parasites.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Bandura, A. (1994).  Social cognitive theory of mass communication.  Bryant, J. & Zillmann, D. (Eds.).  Media Effects: Advances in Theory & Research (123-162).  Howe, U.K.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M. & Signorielli, N. (1994).  Growing up with television: the cultivation perspective.  Bryant, J. & Zillmann, D. (Eds.).  Media Effects: Advances in Theory & Research (pp. 17-60).  Howe, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Harris, R. J. (2009).  A Cognitive Psychology of Mass Communication.  NYC: Routledge.